After digging through the specs, the most interesting aspect of the Asus ZenBook Pro Duo 15 OLED is undoubtedly its screen. It’s a massive, 4K panel with a maximum brightness of 1,000 nits and a ridiculous, infinite contrast ratio of 10,000,000:1. All of this, of course, is backed by a stunningly fast 10-watt driver.
The ZenBook Pro Duo 15 is the latest notebook from Asus. A high-end hybrid laptop/tablet hybrid, the ZenBook Pro Duo 15 is a slick, ultraportable, top-of-the-line device. With the latest Intel® Core™ processors, Asus’s ZenBook Pro Duo 15 is as potent as it is powerful.
It seems that every time I buy a new laptop, I have to deal with complaints from my family that it’s too heavy. I sometimes have to remind them that the average laptop is about 2.2kg, which is about the weight of a small coffee table. But that’s still a lot of weight, especially when you’re dealing with a device that’s big, beautiful, and expensive.. Read more about asus zenbook pro duo 2021 release date and let us know what you think.Asus continues to push its dual-screen laptops. After the release of the Zephyrus Duo 15 at the beginning of the year, it’s now the turn of the ZenBook Pro Duo 15 to hit stores. It was announced at CES in early 2021, but it hasn’t been delivered yet, and we didn’t spend time with it until early June 2021. This delay means that the retail units will only be 10th generation Core i9 configurations. Generation paired with a RTX 3070 dGPU, although Intel’s 11th generation hardware is not. is already available. That’s the ZenBook Pro Duo configuration you can get these days, and that’s what we have here. If we talk about the specifications, two screens are the main advantage of this product: the main screen is OLED and touchscreen, and the second screen is IPS and touchscreen, both with pretty good panels. If you’ve read my previous posts on these dual-screen Asus laptops, I still think the form factor detracts from the practicality and portability of integrating these two screens, so if that’s not a requirement for you, you’re better off with the standard design. We will cover all the intricacies and details in the review below.
Technical data in test – Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582
|Asus ZenBook Pro Duo UX582LR|
|Screen||15.6 inches, 3840 x 2160 px, OLED, glossy, Samsung SDC4143 14 inches, 3840 x 1100 px, IPS, non-glare, BOE BOE085F touch screen|
|Processor||Intel COmet Lake Core i9-10980HK processor, 8C/16T, up to 5.1GHz|
|Video||Intel UHD laptop + Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 8GB (90W, up to 110W with Dyn Boost, GeForce driver 462.59)|
|Memory||32 GB DDR4-2933 (on-board)|
|Storage||1TB NVMe SSD (1 x4 M.2 PCI slot)|
|Link||Wireless 6 (Intel AX201), Bluetooth 5.0|
|Ports||1x USB-A 3.2 gen2, 2x USB-C with Thunderbolt 3, HDMI 2.1, mic/earphone|
|Battery||92Wh, 240W charger, no USB-C charging|
|Size||359 mm or 14.17 (W) x 249 mm or 9.81 (D) x 24 mm or 0.96 (H)|
|Weight||2.4 kg (5.3 lb) + 1.8 kg (1.76 lb) charger and cable, EU version|
|Extras||Keyboard with white backlight, 14″ ScreenPad Plus, HD webcam, IR Hello camera and microphones nearby.|
Design and construction
In terms of design and construction, the ZenBook Pro Duo follows the lines of existing ZenBook laptops in terms of rugged build quality and what Asus calls Ergolift design. This means that the main body of the laptop rests on rubber feet at the bottom of the screen, allowing the keyboard to be tilted slightly and increasing airflow underneath to aid cooling. Compared to the previous ZenBook Pro Duo model, the 2021 update also implements a tilted help screen. The hinge mechanism not only pushes the laptop up, but also separates the second screen from the main chassis and tilts it slightly forward. This makes the content a little more readable, separates the screen from the hot internal components, and allows cool air to flow from the bottom of the screen to the fans. In this way the cooling system draws in fresh air at the top and bottom and expels it through the side vents. It also means that the ZenBook Pro Duo is one of the few modern ZenBooks that doesn’t project hot air onto the main screen, something that bothers me on most other Asus models. I should add that although the ZenBook Pro Duo and the ROG Zephyrus Duo share a similar slanted secondary display and form factor, they differ internally in several ways, which is why the ROG Zephyrus has more powerful hardware and a different thermal design. If there’s enough interest, I’ll cover the differences in a separate article, so let me know in the comments below (and yes, I know I haven’t posted my Zephyrus Duo review yet – too little time and too many products to test). In general, the dual-screen design places the keyboard on the front of the laptop and the touchpad on the side. This is fine if you keep the laptop on your desk, but it’s not ideal because you have to move it further away from you to comfortably place your hands over the sliding keyboard. This design also makes the laptop impractical to use on your lap or on the go, as I described in my previous ZenBook Pro Duo review. The ZenBook Pro Duo 2021 is also a pretty heavy laptop due to its dual-screen form factor, so it’s not an alternative to the Dell XPS 15 or the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Extreme. If you’re looking for a 15-inch ZenBook laptop, I recommend the Pro UX535 (if available in your area). To compare the dimensions, you can see it next to the ROG Zephyrus M16 here. I’m also not happy with the high and rather sharp front bezel and corners, although the included storage pad helps soften them, and the fact that the screen is tilted back 145 degrees. Again, it’s good for desktop use, but otherwise limited. Apart from the size, the input/output of this product is also somewhat limited, but it is conveniently placed on the sides. There’s one USB-A port, but two USB-C ports with Thunderbolt 3 support, a headphone jack, and an HDMI 2.1 port. This is one of the few Asus laptops with HDMI 2.1. There’s no USB-C charger or memory card reader, which is what I expected on this inventor/manufacturer focused device, there’s also no finger sensor, but there is an IR camera with Hello support at the top of the screen.
Keyboard and touch pad
I’ve already mentioned that this laptop does particularly well on a spacious desk, and I’ll repeat it here. In this case, typing on this bottom-mounted keyboard feels like typing on a regular desktop keyboard, and I’d prefer if it had a palm rest. However, the keyboard seems pretty cheap, made of plastic, and I wish Asus had used magnets to attach it to the laptop, like desktop keyboards do. The keyboard has a standard layout and an additional set of function keys in the upper right corner, above the touchpad. Two of them are used to control the ScreenPad screen, one to change the operating modes and the last one is the power button. The typing feel is solid and in line with what you’d expect from an ultra-portable laptop these days. The keyboard is similar to the one Asus uses in other ZenBooks. It features rubberized keys, types quickly and quietly, and has a limited travel. Don’t expect to type comfortably on your lap, hip or in tight spaces unless you have TRex hands….. have. The keyboard is also backlit with white LEDs and three intensity levels. There is still light coming from under the arrows and the top row of function keys, but the LEDs are still pretty bright and fairly even. The touchpad has been moved to the right side, and while it takes some getting used to, I don’t mind its presence. Admittedly, I find the narrow surface that interferes with tracking and gestures disconcerting, as this is an upright orientation and very different from the reclining clickpads you find on most laptops. The surface also makes a lot of noise when tapped. In general, you will probably connect a mouse to this laptop. Finally, there is no finger sensor implemented, but there is an IR camera on the top of the screen, next to the webcam and microphones.
Two screens are the main advantages of the ZenBook Pro Duo 15 OLED UX582. As the name suggests, the main screen is made with OLED technology, has a size of 15-6 inches and a resolution of 4K. The optional screen (called ScreenPad) is IPS, half 4K, and 14 inches in an ultra-wide 32:10 conversion. Both devices support touch and pen input (an input pen is included), but the main screen is glossy while the ScreenPad has an anti-reflective coating to prevent glare on the main screen. There are noticeable differences in image quality and how the eye perceives content between the two screens, not only because one is an OLED screen and the other is an IPS screen, but also because you’re always looking at the ScreenPad from a certain angle. Of course, the tilt mechanism that tilts the screen panel toward you helps with this, but I still found myself reaching for this screen to easily see small details like text. To be fair, Asus can’t tilt it any further without covering the main screen, so they’ve done their best here. The company is also aware of this problem and has added a stand to further elevate the laptop, but it’s not the most practical design. In theory, it’s something you stick to the bottom of the laptop, but it seems thin, doesn’t fit well, and blocks some of the vents when not in use. I like the idea of building a roller coaster, but the execution is flawed. A separate, sturdier stand that you can easily set up and leave on the table would have been better, in my opinion. Anyway, back to the signs. The main screen is OLED and has excellent quality, as you can see below. These are the results of our tests with the X-Rite i1 Display Pro Sensor:
- The material designation of the panel : Samsung SDC4143 (ATNA56WR14-0);
- Coverage: 100% sRGB, 97.5% AdobeRGB, 99.3% DCI-P3 ;
- Measured Gamma : 2.26 ;
- Maximum brightness in the center of the screen: 412.25 cd/m2 at startup;
- Minimum brightness in the center of the screen: 4.94 cd/m2 at startup;
- Contrast at maximum brightness : 1:1 ;
- Period: 6600 K ;
- Black at maximum brightness: 0.0 cd/m2 ;
- PWM: Yes (to be determined).
In addition to unmatched black and contrast, this OLED panel is also bright and vibrant, with an excellent color gamut and outstanding viewing angles. On the other hand, I still don’t think OLED is suitable for all laptops. If you choose one of these panels, you should at least be aware of its characteristics (visible grain, flicker, crushed blacks or shades of gray) and properties, and also know what to do to prevent Windows from wearing out over time. I already covered this in my review of the previous generation ZenBook Pro, so read on. I should add that Asus has improved the quality of the ScreenPad in this updated 2021 model by opting for a nicer, brighter panel, which, along with the tilt mechanism, helps reduce some of the contrast issues that occur when looking at it from an angle.
- The material designation of the panel : BOE BOE085F ;
- Coverage: 94% sRGB, 68% AdobeRGB, 71% DCI P3 ;
- Measured Gamma : 2.21 ;
- Maximum brightness in the center of the screen: 394 cd/m2 at startup;
- Contrast at maximum brightness : 911:1 ;
- Period: 6600 K ;
- Maximum black luminance: 0.43 cd/m2 ;
- PWM: No.
Asus also offers several programs to highlight the usefulness of the ScreenPad, including the ability to create custom switches and dials for Photoshop or Premiere. Some of you will find it useful, but for the most part, I think this ScreenPad will be used to siphon secondary tools and actions from the main screen. So it should make it easier to work on the go when it’s not possible to connect a large external monitor. I still think a secondary OLED ScreenPad would make sense and provide a more consistent experience if Asus decided to go that route. I asked the question, and his explanation for choosing IPS makes sense. There is no ultra-wide OLED panel that they could use, and asking Samsung to develop one specifically for this product would not be a wise financial decision, as it would significantly increase the final price of the product. The OLED ScreenPad may be in the future, but not in this generation.
Equipment and power
Our test model is the high-end Asus ZenBook Pro Duo 15 OLED, codenamed UX582LR, equipped with a 10th generation Intel Comet Lake Core i9-10980HK 8C/16T processor. generation, 32 GB of dual-channel DDR4 2933 memory, 1 TB of SSD storage and a dual graphics card : Nvidia RTX 3070 dGPU with 8GB VRAM and Intel UHD iGPU integrated with the Intel processor. Our test unit was provided by Asus. This is a retail model that is identical to the models available in stores and works with the software that was available in early June 2021 (BIOS 309, MyAsus 188.8.131.52, GeForce 462.59 driver). In terms of specs, the ZenBook Pro 2021 is based on the previous generation’s Intel platform, but paired with the latest Nvidia hardware. The Core i9-10980HK has 8C/16T and an estimated TDP of 45W, but in the power profile this model can do much more. Intel’s 11. The 10th generation is already on the market, and the fact that this model will be available with the 10th generation is a big advantage. The fact that this is the third generation may put some buyers off, and for good reason. Multi-core performance is still strong here, but the 11th generation i9 is not. The 2nd generation is faster in terms of IPC and single core processors, more efficient and available with faster gen4 memory, which may also make a difference for some of you who use this type of laptop for workstations. The GPU is an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 laptop chip with 90W of power, which can be increased to 110W in supported games, with Dynamic Boost 2.0. In addition, the laptop has 32GB of DDR4 2933 RAM and a PCIe Gen3 x4 M.2 SSD memory slot. Access to the components is fairly simple: Simply lift the back panel, which is held in place by a pair of Torx screws. Beware, three of these screws are hidden behind plastic caps that must be removed first, and removal is not as easy as the rubber caps on the Zephyrus Duo. Inside, access an SSD storage slot and experience an updated thermal design and improved 92-watt performance over the previous generation ZenBook Pro Duo. Speaking of specifications: Asus offers two power profiles for this ZenBook, which are available in the MyAsus app:
- Standard – standard CPU/GPU performance and moderate fan profile – GPU running at around 8%.
- Performance – higher CPU/GPU power and faster/quieter fans – GPU runs up to 110W, but on standard clock.
In general, both profiles meet basic needs well, one for general use and the other for situations where you need to push the hardware to the limit. However, the software on this ZenBook is more limited than on the ROG laptops. What I miss most is the quiet profile with the ability to turn off the fans for light everyday use. Otherwise, the standard profile offers fast and generally quiet daily operation. Two screens are very convenient for daily use and work, but you should know that using both screens will significantly reduce battery life. To move on to more demanding loads, we begin testing CPU performance by running the Cinebench R15 test over 15 times per cycle, with a 1-2 second delay between each run. The Core i9 processor runs at a consistent 95+W in performance settings, which is much higher than most i9 implementations we’ve tested so far. This is combined with good frequencies and values around 1650 and strong fans at 48-49dB at head height. Switching to the default profile limits the constant CPU power in this test to ~50W, with lower values and much quieter fans (35-37dB). Finally, CPU performance stabilizes at ~45W on the battery in the quieter default profile, which is still very good for use without power. Details below. To put these results in perspective, the i9-11980HK is the 10th generation. In this multithreaded benchmark, the 8th generation is no match for AMD’s 8C/16T Ryzen 4000/5000 processors available in high-performance laptops today, and would likely be outperformed by the 11th generation Intel Core H. Additionally, both the Intel and AMD alternatives offer significant IPC improvement. We then verified our results with the more extensive Cinebench R23 cyclic test and the dreaded Prime 95 in the performance profile. The processor is stabilized at 95+W in both cases. We also ran combined CPU+GPU stress tests with this laptop. 3DMark Stress runs the same test 20 times per cycle, looking for changes and degradation in performance over time, and this unit passed it perfectly, with consistent performance. Overall, the ZenBook Pro is a solid hardware build that can handle unexpectedly high power consumption under extended loads, but there’s only so much you can get out of the i9-10980HK at this point. Is that enough, or do you prefer the AMD platform offered by Asus in the very similar 2021 ROG Zephyrus DUO. We then ran all the tests and benchmarks using the default performance profile in the MyAsus application.
- 3DMark 13 – Firestrike: 20044 (Graphics – 23472, Physics – 20525, Combined – 9409) ;
- 3DMark 13 – Port Royal : 5648 ;
- 3DMark 13 – Time Spy : 9315 (Graphics – 9378, CPU – 8977);
- Uniengine Overlay – 1080p Extreme: 5953 ;
- Uniengine Overlay – Medium 1080p : 16822 ;
- Handbrake 1.3.3 (encoding 4K to 1080p): 39.51 fps on average ;
- PassMark 10 : Score: 4102 (CPU score: 16774, 3D graphics score: 12960, disk score: 21879);
- PCMark 10 : 6019 (Fundamentals – 9189, Productivity – 7606, Digital content creation – 8467) ;
- GeekBench 5.33.1 64-bit : Mononuclear: 1298, multi-core: 7583 ;
- CineBench R15 (best execution): CPU 1646 cb, Single Core CPU 199 cb ;
- CineBench R20 (best execution): CPU 3860 cb, Single Core CPU 486 cb ;
- CineBench R23 (best execution): CPU 9159 cb, Single Core CPU 1226 cb ;
- x265 HD Benchmark 64-bit: 38.03 sec.
By comparison, the i9-10980HK performs well in this product: The above performance is better than the MSI GE76 Raider and is about the same as the 2020 Zephyrus Duo, both high-end products with more demanding thermal modes. In the meantime, on the 11th. The Core is and Ryzen 9 4000/5000 generation performs 5-20% better than the previous i9 generation in multithreaded performance and IPC in various tests. The GPU consumes between 90 and 110W, which doesn’t make it as powerful as some larger gaming laptops, but brings it closer to ultra-portable models. For example, it beats the RTX 3070 80-100W we tested in the ROG Zephyrus G15 by ~5%, but beats the RTX 3070 115-130W we tested in the ROG Strix G17 by 5-15%. We also carried out various work related to the workplace:
- Blender 2.90 – BMW car scene – CPU calculation: 3 m 52 s (Performance) ;
- Blender 2.90 – BMW car scene – GPU calculations: 40s (CUDA), 18s (Optix) ;
- Blender 2.90 – Scene in the Classroom – CPU Compute : 10m 30s (performance) ;
- Blender 2.90 – class scene – GPU calculation: 2m 27s (CUDA), 1m 6s (Optix) ;
- Luxmark 3.1 – Luxball HDR – OpenCL CPUs + GPUs score: – ;
- SPECviewerf 13 – 3DSMax: 148.08 (power);
- SPECviewerf 13 – Catia: 123.38 (power);
- SPECviewerf 13 – Creo: 137.69 (power);
- SPECviewerf 13 – Energy: 23.2 (power);
- SPECviewerf 13 – Maya: 180.9 (power);
- SPECviewerf 13 – Medicine: 56.78 (power);
- SPECviewerf 13 – Showcase: 105.26 (power) ;
- SPECviewerf 13 – SNX: 18.2 (power);
- SPECviewerf 13 – SW: 80.99 (power).
And the new SPECviewperf 2020 test:
- SPECviewerf 2020 – 3DSMax: 79.67 (power);
- SPECviewerf 2020 – Catia: 52.78 (power);
- SPECviewerf 2020 – Creo: 61.28 (power);
- SPECviewerf 2020 – Energy: 23.31 (power);
- SPECviewerf 2020 – Maya: 202.87 (power);
- SPECviewerf 2020 – Medicine: 27.2 (Performance) ;
- SPECviewerf 2020 – SNX: 18.44 (power);
- SPECviewerf 2020 – SW: 131.94 (power).
They also assume a powerful version of the i9 processor and the medium RTX 3070. It is up to you to decide if this configuration is sufficient for your work, but for most of you it should be sufficient. Of course, this would have been more possible with the 11th generation Core i9. At this point, I don’t know if the Asus ZenBook Pro Duo will be updated soon, and if not, the ROG Zephyrus Duo remains a more functional alternative in a single form factor. With that out of the way, let’s also look at a few games. We ran several DX11, DX12 and Vulkan games with the default Performance and Standard profiles at 4K and FHD resolutions on the internal screen. Here’s what we got:
|Intel Core i9-10980HK Laptop + RTX 3070 90-110W||4K Performance||FHD performance||Standard FHD||FHD performance, external monitor||QHD performance, external monitor|
|Far Cry 5 (DX 11, Ultra Preset, SMAA)||51 fps (44 fps, 1% less)||110 frames per second (78 frames per second – 1% low)||103 fps (80 fps – 1% low)||–||–|
|Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (DX 11, Ultra-preset)||75 frames per second (38 frames per second – 1% low)||177 frames per second (100 frames per second is 1% less)||161 fps (96 fps is 1% less)||188 frames per second (32 frames per second – 1% low)||133 fps (28 fps – 1% low)|
|Red Dead Redemption 2 (DX 12, Ultra-optimized, TAA)||43 fps (32 fps – 1% low)||97 frames per second (66 frames per second, 1% less)||86 frames per second (62 frames per second – 1% low)||102 fps (28 fps – 1% low)||77 frames per second (14 frames per second – 1% low)|
|Rise of Tomb Raider (DX 12, very high preset, FXAA)||44 fps (32 fps – 1% low)||110 frames per second (55 frames per second, 1% lower)||95 frames per second (47 frames per second – 1% low)||–||–|
|Shadow of Tomb Raider (DX 12, maximum preset, TAA)||44 fps (26 fps – 1% low)||70 frames per second (44 frames per second, 1% less)||62 fps (40 fps – 1% low)||–||–|
|Shadow of Tomb Raider (DX 12, max preset, TAA, RTX Ultra)||–||59 frames per second (38 frames per second, 1% less)||51 fps (34 fps – 1% low)||–||–|
|Alien Brigade (Vulcan, Ultra preset)||76 fps (66 fps is 1% less)||171 fps (117 fps – 1% low)||151 fps (109 fps – 1% low)||–||–|
|The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (DX 11, Ultra preset, Hair Work On 4)||48 frames per second (25 frames per second is 1% less)||106 frames per second (73 frames per second – 1% low)||82 fps (62 fps – 1% low)||107 frames per second (28 frames per second – 1% low)||83 fps (14 fps – 1% low)|
- The Witcher 3 – Recorded with the fraps/in-game FPS counter in campaign mode;
- Far Cry 5, Metro, Middle Earth, Strange Brigade, Red Dead Redemption 2, Tomb Raider – registered with benchmark programs included;
- Optimized profile of Red Dead Redemption 2 based on these settings.
At FHD resolutions, we see solid performance, while with RTX or 4K games, you have to turn down the graphics settings to get 60+ fps in the latest games. I was wondering if turning the screen bar on or off would have any noticeable effect on the game’s performance, but it doesn’t. However, this can happen if, for example, you are running other demanding workloads at the same time as the game. B. OBS. For comparison, the more powerful RTX 3070 in the Strix G17 gaming laptop delivers 10-20% better performance in games (we explain the differences below). Fair is fair, this ZenBook Pro is not primarily a gaming laptop, as it does not have a MUX switch and is only available with 60Hz displays; therefore, tearing and ghosting will affect the experience compared to dedicated gaming devices of this generation. If you look at the logs below, you’ll see that not all games scale well to FHD resolution with Dynamic Boost 2.0, and when they do, energy isn’t being redirected from the CPU to the GPU, as seen in the logs for Far Cry 5 and Shadow of Mordor in the performance profile. This reduces the performance and power of the GPU and increases the temperature of the CPU. By comparison, the Witcher 3’s CPU reduces power and transfers it to the GPU, resulting in more balanced temperatures and better performance. The system distributes power much better to the GPU at 4K resolution, which translates into lower CPU temperatures in this case. QHD is still the best option for this configuration, ideally on an external display, which we’ll talk about later. Switching to standard mode limits the CPU and GPU, whose power in this mode barely exceeds 80W. This affects performance in all games, but the fans are much quieter in this mode (less than 40dB vs. 46-48dB in Performance mode), and the temperature does not exceed 80C for the CPU and GPU in the games tested. This default profile is very well balanced for games and combined CPU+GPU loads. I really appreciate the quiet fans, although some might consider this a significant performance loss. Overall, the hardware works well, and connecting an external display eliminates some of the drawbacks of the 60Hz display for gaming. However, it is important to note here that it is connected via HDMI, as it is connected to the dGPU, while the USB-C ports are connected to the iGPU. However, there are two things to note here:
- I think you need a cable with HDMI 2.1 standard. I’ve tried 3-4 different HDMI cables I have in the office, and they all resulted in micro stutters and poor low 1% frequencies, so I haven’t tested much on external displays ;
- The i9+ RTX-3070 specs are good for QHD gaming, but this design is not ideal if you plan to keep the lid closed and place the laptop on a vertical stand. This partially hides the air intakes, and for some reason severely limits the TDP of the GPU in this working model.
Your conclusions on these matters may differ, and I have not had time to investigate them beyond what has been reported above.
Noise, heat, communication, loudspeakers and other
The cooling module consists of two fans and several heatpipes distributed between the CPU, GPU and VRM. The laptop draws in cool air from the bottom and top and exhausts it through the side vents, which is a well thought out thermal design. Note, however, that this device is primarily intended to supply air from above, below the ScreenPad, since the lower grilles are located above the heat pipes, not the fans. This will have an effect if you decide to close the lid and use the unit as a desktop replacement, as explained above, as cool air cannot reach the fans in this mode. The fans are noisy in the performance profile, 46-48 dB at head height. The indoor temperature fluctuates depending on the load, but is generally normal and the outdoor temperature is within a comfortable range. It helps to keep the keyboard away from hot parts, but the main chassis is still pretty hot. Also, keep in mind that FarCry 5 does not run well at FHD resolution in performance mode with Dyn Boost 2.0, which makes the processor hotter than other games, affecting the outside temperature. The fans are much quieter than standard fans, less than 40 dB, while the temperature remains acceptable. In daily use, the fans work during simple standby and multitasking tasks, but they are barely audible. I noticed some coil gain on our sample, and it’s more annoying than the fans. Daily use – watch Netflix on EDGE for 30 minutes, quiet profile, fan at 0 dB *Games – default – play Far Cry 5 for 30 minutes, quiet profile, fan at 38-40 dB *Games – performance – play Far Cry 5 for 30 minutes, fan at 46-48 dB For connectivity, this laptop features WiFi 6 and Bluetooth. During our tests, the device worked perfectly next to the router and at more than 30 meters distance with obstacles in between. There is little room in the laptop for the speakers, which are located on the sides and exit through small grilles on the bottom. They are moderately loud, about 75dB at the head, but the sound quality is not very good, especially the bass is poor. Finally, this laptop also has a webcam and microphones on the top of the screen, as well as IR cameras for Windows Hello. The quality is poor, as with most other modern laptops.
The ZenBook Pro Duo UX582 2021 has a 92 Wh battery, compared to 70 Wh for the previous generation. This is what we got on our test device in terms of battery life when the main screen brightness was set to around 120 nits (~50 brightness) and the ScreenPad was turned off.
- 17W (~5+ hours of use)– Google Drive word processor, default mode + enhanced battery mode, 50% screen, Wi-Fi enabled ;
- 12 W (~8 usage)– Full screen 1080p video on Youtube in Edge mode, Standard + better battery mode, screen set to 50%, Wi-Fi enabled ;
- 11W (~8 usage)– Netflix full screen in Edge, default mode + enhanced battery mode, screen at 50%, Wi-Fi enabled ;
- 27W (~3-4 hours of use) – Edge mode display, default + best performance, screen set to 50%, Wi-Fi enabled.
Activating the ScreenPad at 50% brightness further reduces these values:
- 24W (~4 hours of use) – Google Drive text editing, default mode + enhanced battery mode, both screens at 50%, Wi-Fi enabled ;
- 34W (~3+ hours of use) – Edge mode display, enhanced power mode, both displays at 50%, Wi-Fi enabled.
Because of the tilt angle, you’ll likely need to keep the ScreenPad at a higher brightness level to display content at such a steep angle, which can further reduce battery life. Also keep in mind that OLED screens use less black and more light. That means Windows and apps go dark and you expect your mileage to be affected by what’s on the screen. I should add that the laptop comes with a medium 240 watt power supply that weighs ~1.7 pounds (.78 kg) in the two-piece European version, including cables. Charging via USB-C is not provided, however, which is surprising given the two TB3 ports on this laptop.
Price and availability
The Asus ZenBook Pro Duo 15 OLED UX582 is currently on sale in some regions, mostly in the configuration tested here, but with an i7 or i9 processor. The i7 model costs just under £3,000 here, while the i9 model costs a little more, both with 32GB of memory and 1TB of storage. That’s worth a lot! The i9 appears to be the only model available in North America, priced at $299 MSRP. That’s slightly more expensive than the RTX 3070 + FHD 300Hz ROG Zephyrus DUO configuration, which costs around $2,900 (standard), and much more expensive than the RTX 3060 Zephyrus Duo variant, which costs $2,200 and likely has a similar GPU workload due to the higher power allocated to the graphics in this design. As far as I know, there is no version of the ZenBook Pro Duo with RTX 3060, but hopefully Asus will consider adding it when/if it brings the processor to the eleventh generation as well. I think this version will be a more reasonable choice for potential buyers, with a price tag of around $23-2400/euro. Prices and configurations may change in the near future, so check local stores or websites like Amazon for possible discounts.
The ZenBook Pro Duo is no ordinary 15-inch laptop. This represents a significant premium over standard laptops with similar specifications, which is justified by the technology behind this product and the two touchscreens. In fact, these two screens are a major decision factor for this type of product, as is the fact that the main screen is OLED and touch-sensitive. These two factors make the ZenBook Pro Duo an interesting workstation laptop that stands out from most other options. Aside from the benefits of having two screens in one device, and the advantages of that gorgeous OLED panel, there are a few compromises with this design. For example, this ZenBook Pro is pretty heavy and clunky for a 15-inch laptop with similar specs to, say, the ROG Zephyrus G15/M16 models. It’s also less convenient unless you have a spacious desk, due to the downward-sloping keyboard, and is currently only available with tenth-generation Intel hardware. However, the high price and the fact that Asus is also offering the ROG Zephyrus Duo are the crucial aspects that may deter potential buyers from this series at the moment. If you’re content with the convenience of an IPS display (with inferior image quality), and especially if you plan to use it often for gaming, the ROG Zephyrus Duo is a fairly comparable dual-screen product, for a lower price (a little or a lot less, depending on your setup). However, it does offer more powerful hardware (Ryzen 5000 processors and more powerful GPUs), better thermal design, better software, perhaps a better keyboard and better sound. While the ZenBook Pro Duo previously had no direct competitor in the small laptop segment with dual screen performance, now that the Zephyrus Duo is also a viable alternative, its design and 4K OLED touchscreen are the only major differentiators. Are they enough to compensate for everything else? I don’t know, but I’d love to hear what you think of this series in the comments section below. Denial: Our content is supported by our readers. If you make a purchase through certain links on our site, we may receive an affiliate commission. Read more. Andrei Girbea, Editor-in-Chief of Ultrabookreview.com. I’ve been involved in mobile computing since the 2000s, and you’ll find detailed reviews and tutorials written by me on the site.The 2017 update of the ZenBook Pro, the UX580 and UX580FN, has been released. The ASUS ZenBook Pro is a high-tech notebook with a detachable screen. It is available in various configurations including with an Intel Core i7 processor, NVIDIA GeForce 930M or 950M discrete graphics and up to three 512 GB NVMe SSDs. The UX580 and UX580FN have slightly slower processors and slightly slower HDMI 2.0 port.. Read more about asus zenbook pro duo ux582 release date and let us know what you think.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Asus ZenBook Pro Duo worth it?
If you’re looking for a new ultrabook that packs a big punch, the ASUS ZenBook Pro Duo is a great option. It offers a quality display, great performance, and amazing battery life for a reasonable price. That said, the display is an OLED panel, so it’s not an ideal choice for everyone. The new Asus ZenBook Pro was announced at CES 2018 and it is the thinnest and lightest ZenBook yet. It is also the first one available with an OLED display. The ZenBook Pro has a unique design that makes it look more like a MacBook than any other ZenBook, and it is also the first one in the lineup to have a Thunderbolt 3 port. It also has no optical drive and a controversial removal of the SD card slot for a faster PCIe SSD. It also has a unique hinge that enables the screen to be rotated into a tablet mode. The new model is also available with Intel’s 8th Gen Core processors (from the Core i7-8705G to the Core i7-8809G). The
How much is ZenBook Pro 15?
I’m quite partial to the Zenbook Pro 15, the most expensive and most powerful of Asus’ ultrabook lineups. It’s a great alternative to the MacBook Pro, and while it doesn’t have the same design pedigree as its Mac stablemate, it packs a punch that’s suitable for most people. Asus has a terrific line of premium ultraportable laptops, and their latest is a 12″ ZenBook Pro Duo with an OLED screen. Curious about the specs, I looked forward to reading the review, but it took me by surprise when I saw the headline: “2.5Ghz Intel Core i7, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD, 2x2WiFi, Bluetooth”. The ‘2.5Ghz’ part is misleading, for the CPU’s actual speed is only 4.2GHz. The ‘8GB’ RAM is an over-enthusiastic exaggeration, for the laptop has only 4GB. And the ‘2x2WiFi’ is a complete fabrication, because there’s only one WiFi antenna
Is Asus ZenBook Pro Duo good for gaming?
The Asus Zenbook Pro Duo is a premium laptop that aims to compete with the top of the line gaming laptops. It comes with the best hardware in the business, and it’s packed with cutting edge features, but is it worth the price? The Asus ZenBook Pro Duo is the company’s flagship laptop, a version of its popular ZenBook Pro, which is available in 13 and 15-inch varieties. This laptop is aimed at gamers and power users, and it’s on the pricey side, but to be honest, we consider it a gaming laptop. It’s not meant to be a daily driver, so to keep costs down, Asus has given the laptop a few ways to save money. The first is by omitting a backlit keyboard, which is hardly a sacrifice for most gamers. The other is by including a pretty standard Nvidia 940m GPU.
asus zenbook pro duo 2021asus zenbook pro duo 15 oled (ux582lr)asus zenbook pro duo 15 oled priceasus zenbook pro duo 2021 release dateasus zenbook pro duo ux582 priceasus zenbook pro duo ux582 release date,People also search for,Feedback,Privacy settings,How Search works,asus zenbook pro duo 2021 release date,asus zenbook pro duo 15 oled (ux582 price),asus zenbook pro duo ux582 price,asus zenbook pro duo ux582 release date,zenbook pro duo 15 oled release date,asus zenbook pro duo 15 ux582 release date,asus zenbook pro duo 15 release date,zenbook pro duo 15 oled (ux582) release date